because investors up here tend to be conservative by nature, which makes the Internet a very scary place. That said, Tucows Inc.
stands out because it's based in Toronto and it's the fourth largest domain
name supplier in the world. (Makes me want to belt out a rousing rendition of "Oh Canada"). The company gained a big supporter earlier this year when Mark Cuban acquired an 8% stake. This is Cuban's second stab at a Canadian dot-com. His initial foray - Mamma.com Inc.
- ended rather inauspiciously when Cuban abruptly sold his 6.6% stake after taking issue with a private equity offering
done by Mamma. It probably didn't help that Mamma is being investigated
by the SEC. Anyway, I'm digress. Tucows picked up analyst coverage -
well, one analyst - after long-time shareholders decided to unload 22
million, or about 30% of the company, three months ago. One of the reason that Desjardins Securities
analyst David Shore is bullish on Tucows because of its Blogware blog publishing tool, which competes against TypePad,
Blogger, etc. What makes Tucows interesting is it doesn't sell
directly but through a 6,000 network of ISPs and Web hosting
companies. The stock is selling for less than $1 a share, which means
Cuban probably spent his daily per diem on his stake. For more details
about Tucows, check out my story in today's Financial Post.
|
||||
|
Thursday, November 24
by
Mark Evans
on Thu 24 Nov 2005 02:37 PM EST
Canada doesn't have too many exciting dot-com plays - perhaps
because investors up here tend to be conservative by nature, which makes the Internet a very scary place. That said, Tucows Inc.
stands out because it's based in Toronto and it's the fourth largest domain
name supplier in the world. (Makes me want to belt out a rousing rendition of "Oh Canada"). The company gained a big supporter earlier this year when Mark Cuban acquired an 8% stake. This is Cuban's second stab at a Canadian dot-com. His initial foray - Mamma.com Inc.
- ended rather inauspiciously when Cuban abruptly sold his 6.6% stake after taking issue with a private equity offering
done by Mamma. It probably didn't help that Mamma is being investigated
by the SEC. Anyway, I'm digress. Tucows picked up analyst coverage -
well, one analyst - after long-time shareholders decided to unload 22
million, or about 30% of the company, three months ago. One of the reason that Desjardins Securities
analyst David Shore is bullish on Tucows because of its Blogware blog publishing tool, which competes against TypePad,
Blogger, etc. What makes Tucows interesting is it doesn't sell
directly but through a 6,000 network of ISPs and Web hosting
companies. The stock is selling for less than $1 a share, which means
Cuban probably spent his daily per diem on his stake. For more details
about Tucows, check out my story in today's Financial Post.
by
Mark Evans
on Thu 24 Nov 2005 07:28 AM EST
I
saw a photograph in a newspaper yesterday in which Bill Gates was
handing out the Xbox to a customer (white geek-looking male wearing
glasses and a bad hat). The photograph and Gates' decision to
personally hand over
the first Xbox is just more evidence of Microsoft's brilliant and
well-executed marketing campaign. In many ways - be it leaks,
"frank" discussions with major business publications or reports Xbox is
already sold out (easy to do if you decide to "manage" the
shipping process) - Microsoft has convinced the media and
consumers the Xbox is a revolutionary product that is not only going to
shake up the gaming industry but jump-start the company's growth
prospects. In many respects, Microsoft has no choice but to put its
marketing machine behind Xbox because it's not like the new version of
Windows or Office 54 is going to blow away investors and consumers.
Xbox is about buzz and sizzle, which Microsoft desperately needs more
of. From a financial perspective, I'm not sure how much weight to put
on a research report by iSuppli, which suggests Microsoft is losing
$153 on every Xbox sold based on the cost of the components vs. the
$399 retail sales price. If you're as big as Microsoft, you are likely
get
big volume discounts. Then again, the action is probably not in
hardware but the
software needed to use the new Xbox: it's the old razor and blades
game. In any
event, the fact I'm writing this post on Xbox just demonstrates
how even the skeptics (and non-game players) out there have been caught
in the Microsoft PR machine. |
My blog has moved.
Check out the new Mark Evans. It's part of my mini-blog empire that also includes All About Nortel and Twitterrati. You can subscribe to Mark Evans Tech by clicking on the RSS symbol above.
Check Out These Blogs
Search
Login
|
|||
|
||||
I
saw a photograph in a newspaper yesterday in which Bill Gates was
handing out the Xbox to a customer (white geek-looking male wearing
glasses and a bad hat). The photograph and Gates' decision to
personally hand over
the first Xbox is just more evidence of Microsoft's brilliant and
well-executed marketing campaign. In many ways - be it leaks,
"frank" discussions with major business publications or reports Xbox is
already sold out (easy to do if you decide to "manage" the
shipping process) - Microsoft has convinced the media and
consumers the Xbox is a revolutionary product that is not only going to
shake up the gaming industry but jump-start the company's growth
prospects. In many respects, Microsoft has no choice but to put its
marketing machine behind Xbox because it's not like the new version of
Windows or Office 54 is going to blow away investors and consumers.
Xbox is about buzz and sizzle, which Microsoft desperately needs more
of. From a financial perspective, I'm not sure how much weight to put
on a research report by iSuppli, which suggests Microsoft is losing
$153 on every Xbox sold based on the cost of the components vs. the
$399 retail sales price. If you're as big as Microsoft, you are likely
get
big volume discounts. Then again, the action is probably not in
hardware but the
software needed to use the new Xbox: it's the old razor and blades
game. In any
event, the fact I'm writing this post on Xbox just demonstrates
how even the skeptics (and non-game players) out there have been caught
in the Microsoft PR machine.